[criminal records] On February 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on May 9, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 9, 2013, and the parole period was expired on May 21, 2014 during the execution of the sentence in the prison for interest, and was paroled on May 21, 2014.

[2] The Defendant is a reporter’s interest editing and publisher who registered a newspaper with the name of “H” from September 2, 2014, and published a regional newspaper of “I” (former J).

1. The Defendant held that a public official would be subject to criticism articles in the event that he or she would put himself or herself into an article of criticism against his or her maintenance and management and will not be subject to his or her demand.

A. The Defendant posted the article of criticism against the victims working in the Culture and Tourism Department I at several times. Accordingly, the victims had fear against the Defendant.

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant requested the Culture and Tourism Department located in the Office of the Bank of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, and requested the victim to purchase a right of 1,000 novel 1,00 published by the victim, and expressed the victim’s desire to refuse it, and the Defendant expressed a large volume of sound that “the support that this son was provided with the creation of a creative work;

The books were continuously demanded and continued, and the demand was made hot by means of using the same rotory article in the event of refusing the demand.

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant promised to purchase 150 tickets from the person suffering from frighting, and was delivered KRW 2.1 million to the account in the name of “H” operated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2) On July 2016, the Defendant demanded that the victim, who was frighten in the foregoing culture and tourism division, was “the victim, who was frighten in the advertisement, changed the amount of KRW 3 million with the advertising expenses to be set off,” but the victim already refused the Defendant’s demand because he was delegated to the Press Foundation.