손해배상
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. The portion added or added shall be the 14th 4th 14th tier in the judgment of the first instance, and the 15th tier in the “ September 8, 2018” shall be replaced by “ July 27, 2019,” and the 15th tier in the following table:
The 5th to 14th of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.
“The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff A and B damages for delay at each rate of 5% per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act from February 5, 2015 to October 26, 2018, which is the date of the instant accident, and 15% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment. The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff 20,774,211 won [property damages = 5,774,211 won [the amount shall be 6,395,82 won (6,732,508 won x 95%) from the day after offsetting the negligence to the day of full payment, 6,395,82 won per annum - 621,6715,000 won per annum 15,000 won per annum from February 5, 2015] and 205.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as without merit. Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff C is partially unfair, but the judgment of the court of first instance cannot be modified disadvantageously to the plaintiff C under the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration in the case that only the plaintiff C appealed appealed. Thus, the plaintiffs' appeal shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.