소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
purport, purport, and.
A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. After completing a marriage report on February 22, 1974, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were married to their husband and wife, the Defendant brought a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking a divorce, etc. with the Changwon District Court 92D7172 around 192 in the Plaintiff’s continued life, and the Defendant brought a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking a divorce, etc. on August 12, 1993, which became final and conclusive on November 12, 1994. < Amended by Act No. 4794, Nov. 12, 1994>
In the above divorce lawsuit, with respect to the Defendant’s filing for payment of KRW 60 million as property division, the above court: (a) reverted each property under the name of the Plaintiff and the Defendant to the current title holder; (b) however, the property division order equivalent to the difference between the appraised value of each contributory portion and the appraised value of each contributory portion is given in monetary compensation; (c) thereby ordering the Defendant to divide the ownership of the real estate including the instant housing and the instant housing site; and (d) on the other hand, the Plaintiff
(However, as a result of division of property, the Defendant’s claim for division of property was dismissed on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have any difference in the contributory portion to the Defendant.
On the other hand, the instant housing and the instant housing site are real estate that the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 2, 1981 due to the sale on August 11, 1981, and the real estate in attached Form 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) is real estate for which the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 29, 194 due to the division of common property on March 21, 1994.
From April 1982, the Plaintiff had resided after making a move-in report on the instant housing from around April 1982, and even after the divorce judgment, including the above division of property, has been finalized, the Plaintiff is residing in the instant housing and used the instant land C as a marina, etc.
[Ground of recognition] Fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (if there are serial numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and pleading.