If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On June 2, 2015, the Defendant, within the “C” located in Malgo (C) around 01:00 on June 2, 2015, provided that, if having sexual intercourse with a foreign male, he/she would have received approximately KRW 10,000 ( approximately KRW 1,400,000 in the amount of Han C) on one occasion, he/she engaged in sexual traffic and received approximately KRW 1,40,000.

2. On May 15, 2016, the Defendant, within the scope of “D” located in Malgo (0:00 on May 15, 2016, provided that, when having sexual intercourses with foreign men, he/she would be provided with approximately KRW 12,000 on one occasion on the condition that he/she would receive approximately KRW 1,680,00 ($ 1,680,000 on one occasion, and received approximately KRW 1,680,00.

3. On May 16, 2016, the Defendant, within the scope of “D” located in Makao on May 16, 2016, provided that, when having sexual intercourses with foreign men, he/she would have been provided with approximately KRW 12,000 ($ 1,680,000 in Korean Won) on one occasion, he/she engaged in sexual traffic and received approximately KRW 1,680,000 on one occasion, on condition that he/she would have sexual intercourses with foreign men.

4. On May 17, 2016, the Defendant, within the scope of “D” located in Makao on May 17, 2016, provided that, when having sexual intercourses with a foreign male, she would be provided with approximately KRW 12,000 ($ 1,680,000 in Korean Won) on one occasion, she engaged in sexual traffic and received approximately KRW 1,680,000 on one occasion on the condition that he/she would have sexual intercourses with a foreign male.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol concerning E or F;

1. Application of a new statement of bank transactions and individual entry or departure regulations;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the Criminal Procedure Act is 30 times the number of sexual traffic recognized by the defendant by an investigative agency is 40 million won and its profits are 40 million won, and some of the crimes were committed after marriage. The prosecutor prosecuted only the above cases for which the date and time are specified among them.

Considering this point, it is judged that the amount of fine specified in the summary order is reasonable for the defendant.

Part of other suspects.