However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who drives a Dsch Rexroth vehicle.

On October 3, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle as a business of 04:10 on October 3, 2014, and led the F Company E in front of the Daegu Suwon-gu to drive the intersection in front of the F Company E at a four-lane distance from the flood slope of the water level to the pandle distance.

Since it is an intersection with a signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the signals as instructed by the signal apparatus, to observe the regulatory speed (70K/h) and to prevent the accident by operating the signal apparatus, and to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the victim G (the age of 32) who dried up the road immediately adjacent to the crosswalk in accordance with the crosswalk signals was taken by the front side of the above vehicle, when he was negligent in driving more than 20 K m/h or more than the regulatory speed of the road, and was negligent in driving over at least 20 K m/h of the road on the left side of the road driving direction.

Ultimately, at around 09:34 of the same day, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the decrease in the amount of external blood caused by the decrease in the amount of external blood while receiving treatment from an emergency room of the Ganbuk University Hospital at around 09:34 of the same day.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Automobile Management Act is the owner of a Dsch Rexroth vehicle.

On May 2014, the Defendant installed LED light, etc. at a company specialized in light light, etc., “H,” located in Ansan of Gyeonggi-do, and changed the length of plug from the front side to the end of the vehicle from the front side of the plug to the end of the vehicle at a company specialized in plug, etc., around August of the same year.

The Defendant arbitrarily changed the structural devices without obtaining approval for change from the competent authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Photographss of a sea-going vehicle, black stuff image data photographs, and pan-fly CCTV image data;