beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.08.21 2013고단1873

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2013, from around 22:20 to 22:35, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, without any justifiable reason, carried out a tin-time tin in Yongdo, and some customers who were at this point were able to take out of the country.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

2. On May 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender from G, a slope belonging to the F District, who was called up after receiving a report on the same ground as the foregoing paragraph (1), at the main point of “E” at around 22:35, 2013; and (b) was posted to the patrol vehicle.

The Defendant, within the Fransh patrol, expressed that he was seated next to the Fransh, that he was able to “I am out of the fransh, I am out of the fransh, and am out of the fransh, I am out of the head of the above H only once, and am out of the blue with his arms four times, am the breast in the blue part, am the right part of the arms, and am out of the arms with the right part of the arm’s length.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order by police officers such as the above H.

3. At around 22:55 on May 7, 2013, the Defendant said that, under the influence of alcohol, there were civil petitioners, such as the F District Office in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, the Defendant said the Defendant said that, “Cracks”, “shacks, racks, deads,” and “Fracks,” the Defendant said that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant said that there was a fluorial victim J., a slope who was faced with a slope, without any justifiable reason.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D, H and J;

1. Articles 314 (1), 136 (1), and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.