1. On September 29, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 as ① a fine for violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as “Violation of the Road Traffic Act”) on the grounds of “Violation of the Road Traffic Act as of August 24, 2008,” ② a summary order of KRW 2 million as of October 2, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “Violation of the Road Traffic Act as of July 27, 2014”) and ③ a summary order of KRW 5 million as of July 29, 2014, respectively.

On October 5, 2014, from around 19:15 to around 19:20, the Defendant driven an E 1 ton truck from around 500 meters in front of a restaurant near the Japanese Private Road located in Jeju Island 2, Jeju, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.187% (Revocation of a driver’s license on September 24, 2014) and without obtaining a driver’s license from around 19:15 to around 19:20.

2. On October 5, 2014, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) 19:40 on October 5, 2014, when driving a cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant: (b) placed the cargo vehicle on the one-lane of the two-lane road in Jeju City while leaving the vehicle at the driver’s seat; (c) was requested from the victim G (31) belonging to the F Zone in the Jeju East East Police Station F Zone, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report, to take a alcohol-free measurement; (d) was refused to take a alcohol-free measurement from the victim; and (e) sought from the victim the victim’s talking that he will arrest him as an flagrant offender on the road with the victim’s buckbuck, thereby interfering with the arrest of a police officer, and at the same time impairing the victim’s right right-hand, and at the same time, damaged the victim’s sexual buck, etc.

3. Interference with business;

A. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the convenience store of the victim I’s operation in Jeju Island around 07:40 on June 18, 2014; (b) at the point of convenience in the operation of the victim I, the Defendant was the victim by force by avoiding a disturbance to the customers who had been under the influence of alcohol while drinking.