However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 3, 2016, Defendant A: (a) leased Ctel 310 and 1008 and employed female employees; and (b) had female employees find the place, and (c) had female employees engage in sexual intercourse with customers in return for approximately KRW 1.50,00 for payment to unspecified male customers, thereby allowing them to engage in sexual intercourse with customers.

2. Defendant B, who was employed by the said employee as a female employee, was engaged in sexual traffic by receiving KRW 150,000 from D, a guest, from around May 3, 2016 to around 22:0 of the said officetel 100,000, and engaging in sexual intercourse with D and once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning suspect interrogation protocol concerning D;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (elective of imprisonment): Defendant B, Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (elective of punishment)

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than two types of basic areas (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts by business, receipt of consideration, etc.) under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the past records of the suspension of indictment for the same type of crime, but there is no history of criminal punishment, recognition of his/her mistake and reflects against him/her, scale and duration of business, etc.) of the punishment of Defendant A according to the sentencing guidelines for Defendant A.