However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 25, 2015, the Defendant published a letter that to sell toyss to Internet NAVER in the Defendant’s residence located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu.

However, the defendant did not possess toys to sell, and did not have intention or ability to sell.

On June 8, 2015, the Defendant posted a false sales advertising report as above, and deceiving the victim C, thereby receiving KRW 20,000 from the said victim as the toy price, and received KRW 28,000 from the victim E on June 8, 2015, KRW 55,000 from the victim F on the 10th day of the same month, and KRW 40,000 from the victim G on the 13th day of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of C, F, G, and E of each of their respective appeals and statements;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;