beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.05.28 2014가합204464

임금

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 105,245,765 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from May 15, 2014 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The defendant is a company engaged in the business of processing and manufacturing art products, etc., and the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter "the plaintiff") is limited to the plaintiff.

) and Appointors (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”)

(2) Around March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff et al. paid KRW 17,40,000, out of the wages of KRW 34,651,180 for February 10, 2014, to the Defendant et al., the Defendant et al. paid KRW 17,40,000 among the wages of KRW 34,651,180 for February 10, 2014.

In March 2014, wages of KRW 32,190,00 and retirement allowances of KRW 65,804,585 were not paid any KRW 115,245,765.

(hereinafter “instant wage claim”). B.

The defendant's goods payment claim against a lot shopping company 1) The defendant is a lot shopping company (hereinafter referred to as "shot shopping").

B) The Defendant’s creditor filed an application for provisional attachment of the Defendant’s claim amounting to KRW 63,645,430 among the sales proceeds, which was the amount calculated by deducting 33% of the commission for the lot shopping from the lot shopping. Accordingly, the Defendant’s claim for the payment of the goods from the lot shopping was served on March 1, 2014. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25174, Apr. 14, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25457, May 4, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25574, May 2, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25179, Mar. 11, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25175, May 2, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25175, Feb. 2, 2014>

3) In addition, on March 19, 2014, Echeon shopping was seized KRW 43,081,810, out of the Defendant’s claim for the price of the goods sold in lot shopping by using the Defendant’s delinquent tax amount against the Defendant as the preserved bond, and this was served on the slot shopping on March 26, 2014. (4) On March 27, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff, etc. on the assignment of the claim regarding the Defendant’s claim for the price of the goods sold in lot shopping (hereinafter “instant contract for the assignment of claims”).