The Defendant recruited, in sequence, with telephone financial fraud assistance officers in order to perform the role of receiving victims directly or in cash, and delivering them to other assistant employees (tentatively referred to as “recovering”) in accordance with the instructions of assistants, who came to know through the Internet website.

1. On March 4, 2019, the financial fraud assistance staff on the name of the crime committed on March 4, 2019 introduced them by phone call to the victim B at an unspecified place on March 4, 2019 and introduced them as the prosecutor and prosecutory investigator of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, and “The case of financial fraud is being investigated, but currently the name of the party was stolen, and the crime was committed by theft. The victim complained against the party, and it is necessary to confirm the state of property in order to prove the stolen fact that the name of the party was stolen. To withdraw the money in the account and return it again to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

In fact, however, there was no intention to return money from the victim, and there was no prosecutor, prosecutor, prosecutor, employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc.

On March 4, 2019, around 17:30, the Defendant, in accordance with the direction of an employee of financial fraud assistance in the name-based financial fraud, obtained KRW 40 million in cash from the victim by misrepresenting the victim to “the proxy E” while deceiving the financial fraud assistance staff.

2. On March 18, 2019, the financial fraud assistance staff on the name of the crime committed by March 18, 2019 called the victim F at an unspecified place on March 18, 2019 and called the victim F on March 11:25, 2019.

In order to prove that the party is not a suspect but a victim, it is necessary to verify the source of the fund, and to withdraw the money in the account and to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.