However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in prison for August 8, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month.

On September 2015, the Defendant tried to enter into an agreement with B in the course of being tried to prosecute B with the charge of fraud, which acquired KRW 35 million by deceiving B as the borrowed money. However, the Defendant refused to enter into an agreement with B by stating that “I would not agree with his/her father without giving his/her loan certificate and his/her father’s certificate of personal seal impression as a joint and several surety.” As such, the Defendant was willing to forge the certificate of borrowing C and the certificate of personal seal impression in the name of C, a joint and several surety, a joint and several surety, who had been staying in a foreign country at the time of his/her stay in

1. On September 22, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the office B located in Ischeon-si D; (b) at the office B located in Ischeon-si; (c) at the name column of the joint and several surety of the C, “E”, “E in the resident registration number column,” and “in the telephone number column and the address column”, the Defendant affixed the C’s personal seal impression impression impression in his possession on the name of the said C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the loan certificate in C, a joint and several surety, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On September 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) indicated “C”, “E”, “A”, “A”, and “J” in the resident registration number column; (b) affixed C’s personal seal impression affixed by the Defendant in his name, and submitted the power of attorney to issue a forged certificate of seal impression to K as if he had been duly formed with the Defendant’s employees, regardless of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering C.