However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 27, 2014, at around 21:33, the Defendant: (a) received a request from a police officer belonging to the Dongcheon Police Station E District Unit, who called “D Farmwon,” who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report, to reduce music sounds from F. of the police officer belonging to the Dongcheon Police Station E zone unit, and called “I ambling the so-called so-called “I amb, I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am. and am. I am. I am. I am and am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. am. am., I am am am., and am. I am. am.. am..... am............ am....................... am.....................

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment prescribed for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against G with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Determination of the same sentence as the order shall be made in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and that the defendant has no criminal records except for two times of fine;