However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 00:55 on December 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim B who was under the influence of alcohol and confirmed that the Defendant was in the exit stairs No. 69 subway No. 4 East Station No. 9 in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, 69 subway No. 4; (b) found the victim B outside the influence of alcohol and did not exist in the surrounding areas; and (c) cut off the Defendant with 1st, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 5,00 won in our physical card owned by the victim in the main machine of the victim.

2. From around 01:05 on December 17, 2013 to 01:29, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and the Defendant fraudulently obtained 6.10,000 won from the mid-gu Seoul Jung-gu Ctash 4’s Da’s Gap, the sum of KRW 6.10,000,000,000, more than three times, and the Defendant, as if the Defendant were B, issued a copy of the Dop Card under the name of B, as described in paragraph (1), and paid the clothes, and used the stolen credit card, and obtained 6.10,000 won by deceiving the employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;