손해배상(의)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim against the Plaintiff’s debtor B is KRW 50,882,327 and the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim against the said debtor B on December 24, 2012.
Basic Facts
Defendant B is a sexual outer who operates the E-type department in Seocho-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant C is a doctor employed by Defendant B and served in the Defendant Hospital after receiving monthly pay.
On December 11, 2012, the Plaintiff consulted the Defendant Hospital with respect to the increase in the rate of sprinke inconvenience, etc., and received an sprinke from Defendant B on December 24, 2012. On the same day, the Plaintiff received an sprinke surgery and a spule surgery from Defendant C.
피고 병원 의료진은 2012. 12. 31.경 원고의 안면 수술부위에 농이 찼음을 확인하고 이후 증상이 호전되지 않자 2013. 1. 24. 그 수술부위에 대한 세정을 실시하였다.
At present, the plaintiff is a state in which the plaintiff has increased the level of sacrine, the sacrine and the part of the sacrine and the part of the sacrine, and this is divided into force and force.
Since the Plaintiff appeared in the upper right eye after the bring surgery and continued inconvenience, on December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff was in accompanying with the nurse of the Defendant Hospital and received treatment from the members of the dental clinic. The Plaintiff confirmed that the snow was exposed to the bomb, and that the bomb was caused by the bomb since the snow was not completely cut off.
On April 22, 2013, the Plaintiff received a pair of operations from the Defendant Hospital.
At present, the plaintiff has a certificate of a fluoral construction of the fluorala and gluoral fluorala in the brush.
On the other hand, the Plaintiff complained of the pain on both sides after the flexible extension, and on June 12, 2013, the Defendant Hospital received the removal of breast-dried goods from the Defendant Hospital.
Defendant B was decided to commence the rehabilitation procedure on May 18, 2017, when the instant lawsuit is pending, as Seoul Rehabilitation Court Decision 2017dan10069.
The Plaintiff reported the claim amount of KRW 119,900,556 against Defendant B as rehabilitation claim, but the Plaintiff denied the claim amount of KRW 119,90,556 on the ground that Defendant B was pending in the lawsuit on June 15, 2017.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 to 3 evidence, 9, 10 evidence (including paper numbers),