beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.08 2016가단5091966

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 17,400,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from March 10, 2016 to December 8, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Small and Medium Business Administration and the Small and Medium Business Corporation (hereinafter “Small and Medium Business Corporation”) selected an executing institution with a sales exhibition center in the whole world for providing localization consultation, vicarious examination and certification, operation of exclusive sales centers for small and medium enterprises, logistics, and establishment and operation of the headquarters for small and medium enterprises. The Defendant is a company selected as an executing institution in the area of North America. The Plaintiff is a major party of the 2013 Electric and Electronic Products to be recruited to promote successful market expansion through strategic joint marketing by organizing an export conference among the small and medium enterprises that the Jinjin intended to enter the market for electrical and electronic equipment.

(b) On September 27, 2013, the company selected as a participating company for the export consortium project. (b) In order to act as an agent for the practice of the large distribution network entry project to expand the local market for products from small and medium enterprises in North Korea, the company mid-term cooperation with B (the representative director C of the defendant) takes charge of the management and supervision of the above entry project in general, support for export and import, support for store operation, etc., and B takes charge of execution of D installation and operation, sales settlement and inland transportation, selection of sales goods, support for sales promotion, and local marketing, support for sales promotion, and consultation; hereinafter referred to as the "the above agreement").

B. The Plaintiff was selected as a participating company as above, and the meaning of EF, which is the basic contract on October 22, 2013, between the Defendant and the Defendant.

Corporation Convention, hereinafter referred to as the "Case Convention,"

on November 11 of the same year, hereinafter referred to as "the contract of this case", which is an individual contract for the goods in question, shall be referred to as "the standard transaction contract of this case".

Each of the instant cases is relevant to the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) as follows:

E events shall be subject to: