beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.14 2014고정43

과실치상

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant has a duty of care to manage children attending a child care center as the president of the Seo-gu Daejeon District Child Care Center C, and prevent safety accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 10:40 on October 18, 2013, suffered a complete escape plan on the left-hand side of the upper left-hand fluor, which requires the victim to be treated for about 4 weeks, by failing to discover the fluoral in spite of the fact that the victim E (one year of age) went from the fluoral park in the Sungdong-gu Daejeon Sungdong-gu, Daejeon, without walking it in the future, and failing to find the fluoral in the future.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intention under Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act. According to the agreement and the statement of non-written application for punishment bound in the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.