When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On March 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from around 05:30 on March 12, 2017 to around 06:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (b) on the water surface room of “C Sari” located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (c) on the water surface of customers who are under the influence of alcohol, made alcohol, such as making a large amount of noise without justifiable reasons; and (d) singing.

2. When the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on March 12, 2017, at the surface room of the “C Mana” above around 06:20 on March 12, 2017, and the slope E belonging to the Seoul Mana Police Station D Mana, Seoul, which arrives at the site upon receiving a 112 report, demands the Defendant to present his/her identification card, the Defendant may not arrest the Defendant “Nata” to E.

We can see, see, see, she will not see it, she will not see it, she will sing, chewing, and she will sing. "In doing so, you used violence to E, such as her fingers, her fingers, her breast part by hand, her fingers, her breast part by hand with the hand floor, her breast part by drinking, and her breast part by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by E, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to E and F;

1. Each statement prepared by G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3(1)20 (a) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbing drinking), Article 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which were committed by the Defendant, did not have any history of criminal punishment for the last 20 years. The confession of the Defendant was made, the degree of the use of violence against the police officer, and the degree of 50,000 won deposited 550,000 won as compensation for damage for the police officer, are considered as favorable to the Defendant. In addition, the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered as follows.