폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
Defendants have a dispute over the problem of peace and heritage between victims D(49 tax) and South-North Korea.
On December 13:37, 2016, Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the finite of the mother in Daegu-si E, and on the ground that the finite would not have the finite, the finite would not have the finite, and on the ground that the finite would not have the finite of the finite, the finite was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the finite.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Complaint;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attach photographs ofCCTV image materials);
1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence
1. Defendants to be suspended from sentence: Fine of 300,000 won; and
1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (each day, 100,000 won);
1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants are against each other; the Defendants are not subject to any criminal punishment; the victims and the Defendants are pro ratas, and the victims and the Defendants appear to have led to the instant crime, considering the circumstances that may be taken into account in light of the fact that there are some circumstances to consider the occurrence of the instant crime, such as: (a) the Defendants are going against each other; (b) there is no evidence to punish