For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the victim D on the ground that there was no proof of the relevant crime regarding the violation of the Child Reinstatement Act among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles as to physical abuse under the Child Welfare Act, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.