beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.10.19 2017고단1338

전자금융거래법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall transfer any access medium used in electronic financial transactions to any third person.

Nevertheless, around 16:00 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant received 2.1 million won per 2.1 million won per e.g., the Defendant’s name in front of the South Eup/Myeon Public Health Center located in Nam-si, Namyang-si, Nam-si, and the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s company bank account (B), NAC account (C), and NAC account (D), via Kwikset-si’s service, the Defendant sent 3 copies of the physical card connected to the new bank account to the Defendant, and notified the password of each of the above accounts through the Kaka Stockholm.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the access media used in electronic financial transactions to others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written petition;

1. Details of deposit transactions, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment to a statement of transaction in a new bank account in A);

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is a crime that enables large-scale crimes, such as Bosing, etc., and the need for punishment has been high, three accounts have been transferred, the fact that the account transferred by the defendant was actually used for the crime of fraud, the fact that the defendant did not specifically recognize what contents the crime was used for the crime, and the fact that the defendant did not obtain the benefit of the commitment