When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:40 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant refused to demand a Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Sing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Singing Sing

The tamper’s fat fat fat fat bat, and fat by hand fat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by police officers;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.