When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

To the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, the following facts charged are organized and recognized as follows:

피고인은 2014. 5. 18. 01:59경 군포시 군포로 대야지하차도(부곡동 768-8) 입구에서 ‘취객이 차를 붙잡고 놓아주지 않는다’는 112신고를 받고 출동한 군포경찰서 B지구대 소속 경사 C과 순경 D에게 안산으로 데려가 달라고 하여 순찰차 뒷좌석에 타고 안산시 반월 방면으로 가던 중 갑자기 “어디로 가고 있어, 당장 내려”라고 말하면서 운전 중이던 C의 목덜미를 양손으로 잡아 수회 흔들고 이를 제지하던 D의 왼쪽 팔을 잡아 꺾고 순찰차의 뒷문을 발로 찼다.

At around 02:15 on the same day, the Defendant: C and D determined that it is impossible to operate patrol cars due to the Defendant’s distress inside the patrol car in front of the military patrol car at the time of Mapopo-si, and solicited the Defendant to set up patrol cars and return home to the same person; the Defendant met the face of D once a week, and assault C’s face to restrain it once a week.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted police officers who perform legitimate duties in relation to the handling of 112 Reports and the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to C and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (in consideration of the first offender who has no past record of the crime),

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, assaults two police officers, and the degree of assault is not easy;