변호사법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant was aware that he had been in common.
C through C, “C was subject to fraud, but D was introduced upon the request of “C” to receive a return of money.
On January 8, 2015, the Defendant provided money other than the official marriage cost at the F cafeteria located in Seo-gu, Gwangju, that the Defendant provided the said D’s “Isnam women and international marriage” from D. This is the same as the Defendant was morale.
The phrase “to introduce a former police officer who knows” to hear the word “to see”.
At the request of the police officer, the perpetrator will be detained.
“Along with the fact that the Defendant was working, G, the first executive officer of the Defendant, called “Abre the Defendant’s police officer to prepare documents that may cause damage to the police officer.”
After such talking, the Defendant settled KRW 1 million in advance on the restaurant so that police officers can use it as food expenses, and D settled a sum of KRW 1 million on the restaurant using credit card.
Then, on January 13, 2015, the Defendant called D around January 13, 2015 and sent the head of the investigation department at F cafeteria in the braille.
In order to conduct personnel affairs, 3 million won is required to make money, and 3 million won is prepared." On the same day, D was issued an envelope containing 3 million won in cash from the restaurant in the above restaurant in the point of occupation on the same day.
As a result, the defendant acquired money and valuables and property benefits equivalent to KRW 4 million under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by public officials.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;
1. Application of a document confirming the use of Samsung Card and a copy of the passbook of Gwangju Bank;
1. Relevant legal provisions and Article 111 (1) of the Act concerning facts constituting a crime by an attorney-at-law who has selected a punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. An attorney-at-law for additional collection;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;