2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant divided his mistake, and that the defendant deposited part of the money for the victim when the defendant was in a trial.

However, in light of the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not very good, that the defendant committed again even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, that the defendant did not agree with the victim until he was tried in the court, and that the defendant did not agree with the victim, and the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable, and therefore, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.