If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant of the Infant Protection Act was on duty, and was operated from November 1, 2017 as the representative of the Child Care Center B of the first floor B in the period of harmony.

The Defendant, from November 2, 2017 to October 31, 2019, entered the childcare integration system as if D had not worked as a cook and could not claim a subsidy, and then had the staff in charge of the childcare policy and the staff in charge of the work in charge of the work in the childcare integration system enter the same falsely as if he/she had worked normally, and had the staff in charge of the work in charge of the childcare policy and the staff in charge of the work in charge of the work in the childcare integration system, with the subsidy for cooking personnel expenses for D on December 22, 2017, 40,00,000,000 won on January 25, 2018, 200,000 won on February 23, 2018, and 970,000 won on July 25, 2018 to October 30, 2019 (excluding June 6, 2019).

B received subsidies by making deposits into the E Bank account (SerialF) which is the above childcare center operation account, and by fraud or other improper means.

2. Around August 21, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business, at the H Real Estate Real Estate Agent Office located G in Osan-si, Osan-si, transferred the name of the child care center to the victim I for more than one year under the condition that I transfer the “C child care center” of the first floor to the victim I.

Nevertheless, around October 29, 2019, the Defendant changed the password of the above child care center E-bank account (numberF) without permission on the ground that the victim did not come to talk at the Dong 2th E-bank branch in Masung-si, J. 2019 and prevented the use of the deposit passbook.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the child care center by force so that the above child care center is not paid.

3. The Defendant of defamation: (a) around October 20, 2019, at the K and L House of Osan-si, the victim did not have taken over a child care center and employed M as a child care teacher; and (b) the Defendant called the N of the real estate president even though he did not have received the original cost in cash among children.