However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 29, 2016, at around 21:05, the Defendants got in front of the office of the party who was the victim under 25-1, a 25-1, the Korean Supreme Court Eup at the time of Pakistan. Defendant A, through windows, moved into the victim company office through its windows to the victim company office, and took two, monitoring one, one, one, one, one, one, and one, which are the market value of the victim company. Defendant B, together with the goods owned by Defendant A, stolen the victim company’s property by combining them with the goods owned by Defendant B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and seized articles;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code for the observation of protection and community service order are as follows: (a) the Defendants jointly intruded on the company building accompanying Defendant A and commit the instant crime; and (b) it is not good to commit the instant crime.

However, in light of the fact that the amount of damage is not large and there is no criminal conviction imposed against the Defendants in excess of the fine, and other overall circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.