1. Around 20:10 on March 20, 2013, the Defendant boarded a bicycle before the operation of the victim D (the age of 45) in Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon (the age of 45). On March 20, 2013, the Defendant saw the victim’s right head head part of the victim’s protruding stick, which is a dangerous object for delivery, and was in possession of the materials accumulated in front of the above E gate, one time, and put about two weeks on the victim’s right head part. In other words, the Defendant saw the victim into one time at the left face of drinking.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collective assault, deadly weapon, etc.) committed an assault against the victim F (the age of 42) who is the wife of the said D at the above date, time, place, on the ground that the victim F (the age of 42) did not bring the above stick for mountain use to the boiler room inside the gate, which is a dangerous object in the said place, and committed an assault against the victim three times in the direction of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statements made by witnesses D and F in the second trial records;

1. Statement made by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each photographic statute attached to the investigation report prepared by the Inspector H

1. The point of inflicting an injury on the relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see the following reasons for sentencing), the Defendant asserts that there was no “the victim’s face is taken by drinking” among the facts constituting the crime, and that there was no fact that he was a brue using brue for a large purpose, but there was no fact that he was a brue of brue toward the victim F.

The second protocol of the trial is to be prepared.