However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a new bus B.

On November 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the above bus as around 22:45 as around 22:1, 2020, and caused the Defendant to park on the apartment C apartment D, Changwon-si.

At the time, the driver was getting off at night, and there was no streetlight, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to check whether there was a person at the place to park well and whether there was a person at the place to park, and to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to set the left side of the victim E (63 ) and the chests of the victim E (63 ) who was under his care due to his negligence, to the right side of the bus of the Defendant.

Ultimately, at around November 4, 2020, the Defendant caused the death of a victim who was receiving treatment from G hospital located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, G Hospital on November 4, 2020 due to the above occupational negligence, due to multiple prolonged organs, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the medical certificate of death of a defendant's legal statement, traffic accident report, or death;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. At the time of the accident of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, there was street lamps around the accident site, but there was no street lamps at the accident site, and thus, it was not good to view the accident site. Therefore, even if the defendant neglected to do so, he was the victim by negligence, and the victim caused a serious result of the death of the accident in this case.

However, the defendant is against the crime of this case.

At the time of the accident, the victim is negligent in contributing to the occurrence of the accident or the expansion of damage.

The defendant wishes to have the wife of the defendant by mutual consent with the bereaved family members.