A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. On February 18, 2018, Defendant A: (a) in the “E cafeteria” located in Pakistan around 19:40 on February 18, 2018, Defendant A: (b) under the influence of alcohol, with the partitions consisting of trees owned by the victim F; (c) opened the partitions; and (d) was on the Kacter.

CCTV monitors were laid on the ground.

In addition, the Defendant followed the table, and turned it over to the sloping in the above restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property by destroying the partitions, CCTV monitoring one, the table, one column, etc. that are owned by the victim so that it can be seen as the repair cost.

2. On February 18, 2018, at around 20:05, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 from the police officer belonging to the police station G group in the Pakistan, who was dispatched to the site after having been reported that he frank A was fright; and (b) received a request from the police officer belonging to the G group in the Pakistan police station in order to leave the site to speak and return home; (c) followed the above He by “this son, sick,” and assaulted the Defendant’s fright trees five times as a drink; and (d) he frighted his chest at one time after having frighted his body.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on video recording and video recording to each photograph (victim police officers, property damage) and CCTV image;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Selection of a fine

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A’s act committed a dangerous act, such as gathering a monitor in a restaurant under the influence of alcohol and breaking the scam, is an unfavorable condition to the Defendant.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and the victim is against the defendant by agreement with the victim.