However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Defendant

A is a person who worked as a nurse at the "F Hospital" located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a person who worked as a radiation engineer at the above hospital.

On November 4, 2009, at the above hospital around 08:00, the Defendants: (a) taken a steering system before the above surgery against the victim G (the age of 80) who was knenee in the above hospital; (b) administered the steering system before the above surgery; and (c) carried out CT shooting to confirm whether the blood transfusion was prevented.

In such a case, the defendants engaged in the duties of treating patients, etc., verify whether the growing weight is properly displayed on the bloodline of the victim, and if the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the victim of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the victim of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation

Nevertheless, Defendant A confirmed the victim’s blood ties, and delivered the victim to Defendant B without any particular measure even though he told the victim while carrying out the said “scaming test”, and Defendant B viewed the victim’s scam to be cut off by the victim’s left hand hand, etc., even though he viewed the victim’s blood scambling, Defendant B did not immediately stop the scambling. The Defendants, in light of the victim’s state, should scambling or scam the part of the scam in light of the victim’s scambling condition, but scambling the part of the scam.