대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
the purport and purpose of the claim;
1. Even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court citing the judgment of the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted to this court, it is recognized that the facts of first instance and the judgment are legitimate.
Therefore, the reasoning of this Court regarding the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the modification or addition as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff’s 5th 3 acts in the judgment of the court of first instance, which is amended or added, shall be corrected fromO to “B” by the Defendant C.
The plaintiff 5th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.
Defendant C’s 5th day of the first instance judgment and 9th day of the first instance judgment, Defendant C’s “B” amended to Defendant C.
The joint and several sureties of the first instance judgment No. 12 and 17 of the 12-party 17-party 1 were jointly and severally guaranteed. “Post-joint and several sureties” (Provided, That the payment of KRW 3680,00
No. 14 of the judgment of the first instance court, 12 of the 19th 14th 12, 19 of the 19th Doz. 1 "B" is amended by the evidence No. 1 of Ma. 1.
The facts of the first instance judgment No. 14, 16, each are recognized.
Since there was a change in the "from 17 conduct", it is recognized that the plaintiff's agent "B" was treated as having completed the full repayment of the loan if it was paid to the defendant K in the amount of KRW 2 million.
Thus, Defendant K agreed that the Plaintiff’s agent shall return KRW 2.5 million to N on the date of loan, and that the Plaintiff’s agent shall be deemed to have repaid KRW 2.5 million out of the loan, and that the remainder of the loan shall be repaid upon the completion of the loan.
Defendant K shall be deemed to have completed the repayment of KRW 2 million by remitting a total of KRW 3,250,000,000.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against defendant E is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. Each claim against the remaining defendants is all filed.