beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.14 2017가합200423

임금

Text

1. The Defendant stated to the Plaintiffs the “total amount of cited” column in attached Form 2’s “total amount of cited” and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

(c)the performance-based incentives shall be deemed to correspond to the basic salary, job-based salary and performance-based incentives;

Article 6 (Calculation of Daily Wage and hourly Wage) The daily salary shall be calculated by dividing the monthly salary by 30 days, and the monthly salary shall be calculated by dividing the monthly salary by 209 hours.

Article 9 (Determination on Payment Rate of Performance-Based Annual Salaries) (1) A performance-based performance-based bonus shall be up to 800%.

(2) The guidelines for managing performance-based incentives shall comply with attached Table 2 and the president shall separately determine details thereof.

[Attachment 2] 550% to 800% to 300% to 300% to 300% to 3,500 to 3,57,9, and 40% to 50% to 50% to 3,500 to 3,5,500 to 3,5,9, and to 40% to 40% to 20% to 10% to 20% to 20% to 20% to 20% to 3 a/6a/6a-6a/3 to 3% to 50% to 30% to 30% to 3,5,50 to 30% to 30% to 5% to 30% to 30% to 5% to 1.6% to 0.85 a x 0.86% to 105% to 80% to 50% to 15% to 50% to 1 to 5% to 3.

C. The Defendant Corporation, including the payment of wages by Defendant Corporation, deemed the basic salary as ordinary wages in accordance with the aforementioned collective agreement, remuneration regulations, and other annexed regulations, and based on this, paid the Plaintiffs overtime work allowances, overtime work allowances, night work allowances, holiday work allowances, holiday work allowances, annual leave allowances (hereinafter “all kinds of allowances”) and retirement allowances, respectively.

Defendant Corporation paid incentives (1) incentives, (2) performance-based incentives, (3) statutory appointment allowances, and (4) shift work allowances to the Plaintiffs, but this part does not constitute ordinary wages, and was not included in the calculation basis of various allowances and retirement allowances.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs received from Defendant Corporation from January 2014 to January 2017.