However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B E-car.

Around 22:00 on December 9, 2014, when the Defendant proceeds two-lane roads in front of an international apartment in front of the international apartment located in the U.S. in the U.S. in the primary public health clinic at one-lane from the site. The Defendant, without a proper view, did not accurately operate the steering and steering system, and did not take necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim C(44 years old) who was driving at the center of the yellow cell line due to the occupational negligence over the opposite yellow line, and did not immediately stop the said cargo vehicle at a level of KRW 1,198,591, and does not take necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after an accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen of the kind of punishment (Consideration of attitude, etc.);

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Consideration, reflectiveness, purchase of comprehensive automobile insurance, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);