On May 20, 2009, the Defendant was released on February 28, 201, when he was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 8 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and was released on May 23, 2011.

1. Around June 5, 2011, the Defendant, at the (ju) D D office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, well-known the victim E’s “F of the representative director of the DD company” to the victim E. If the Defendant invested 10 billion won in the said company, he/she decided to appoint the vice president. The said company is proceeding with the construction project of the electric vehicle manufacturing plant in Yong-Nam-gun G., Jeonnam-gun-gun, Seoul. (State) The Defendant would allow the construction of the factory if he/she purchases the non-listed stocks issued by the D company with an amount equivalent to 400 million won of the non-listed stocks issued by the D company, which would change

However, the fact that there was no money to invest in D, the victim purchased (State) emergency stocks, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to subcontract to the victim even if he received the funds from the victim.

around June 27, 2011, the Defendant received 100 million won in cash from the victim at the “I” restaurant located in Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and received property.

2. Around May 25, 2011, the Defendant purchased non-permanent stocks issued by the “(State) DD office at the (State) D office located in the (State) office in Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu. A false statement was made to the effect that the number of workers at the construction site is approximately KRW 2-3,000. The number of employees at the construction site is approximately KRW 5 million. The Defendant would be entitled to the right to operate the restaurant at the site of the road.”

However, it is true that the victim has no intent to deliver the shares to the victim even if he pays the shares for the (state) emergency stocks, and even if the defendant receives the funds from the victim, the victim did not have the intention or ability to grant the right to operate the cafeteria at the construction site.

The defendant is under the name of the spouse of the defendant around May 25, 201 from the victim.