A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

At around 18:15 on April 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent a police officer AC, AD, and AE, who was working in a lawsuit to take a bath without any justifiable reason, by inserting a pel-ray (a total of approximately 27cc in length, approximately 14cc in length) that is a lethal weapon in the main engine during the influence of alcohol at the Gyeonggi-si Police Station AB Station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) around 18:15, the Defendant: (c) sent the police officer, who was working in the lawsuit to take a bath for him; (d) “AC, AD, and AE pursuant to the Ba-gu Police Station; and (e) “Isk-gu, Sucheon-gu, which will take the Ba-gu, and will take the Ba-man’s hair,” and (e) “Isk to kill only one year,” and (e) voluntarily sold the chest at the time Isc.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to AD by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to AB boxes;

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the weight of recommendation according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of recommendation] shall be limited to the case where the aggravated area (1 to 4 years) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (1 to 1 year) (1 to 4 years) (a special person] the threat of collective force or carrying dangerous objects (1 to 1);

2. Determination of sentence: in light of the form of the instant crime in October, the crime is not good, and the risk is high, the number of victimized police officers remains three, the number of injured police officers did not take advantage of them, the crime of interference with business in 207 was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for October, 207, the suspended sentence of two years, and the crime of this case was committed under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant committed a contingent crime.