2. The Defendant has been punished several times, including punishment for the same crime, and has repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime for the same crime.

It is not good that the crime is committed in light of the frequency of crime, the method and contents of crime.

Damage has not been recovered or agreed.

There is no special change in circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the judgment of the first instance.

In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, details and results of the crime, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments and records, the first instance punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit