Seized evidence Nos. 1 through 2 (tension No. 153), 1 through 2, 2014.

around 18:15 on December 30, 2013, the Defendant injected hallucinogenic substances in the Defendant’s vehicle parked on the Don-do Don-do Donsan 66-12 on the two-round Don-si Don-si, both sides of the industrial contact to luene, an industrial coke, which is a hallucinogenic substance, in a white plastic paper, and inhales hallucinogenic substances by inserting them into the entrance of the above sealing and leaving them with a nose and leaving them in a white plastic paper.

No person of "2014 Highest 1292" shall take in or inhale hallucinogenic substances which cause entertainment, hallucination, or anesthesia, or possess them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, around 22:38 on March 21, 2014, the Defendant injected hallucinogenic substances in a way that the Defendant 150g "topcoke" 150g (i.e., a hallucinogenic substance), in a plastic sealing paper, was placed in a foot in the future trade company, 1529-ro 1529-ro, Macco, a hallucinogenic substance, and then booms them into the entrance of a vinyl for about 30 minutes, in a way that the Defendant scams and scamscams into the entrance of a vinyl paper for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 497"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Each request for appraisal;

1. The 2014 Highest 1292 of the dysnoids, vinyls, finite photographs, and internal finite photographs;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the case

1. Relevant provisions of facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 3 of Article 58 and Article 43 (1) of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act (the point of inhaleing hallucinogenic substances), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the decision of types] for the sentencing of narcotics (the decision of sentencing], the medication, simple possession, etc. (the decision of recommending area] / [the scope of recommending area ] 6-1 year [the decision of sentencing] / 6-1 year [the decision of sentencing] / 6-1 year and 6 months [the decision of sentencing] / June 6 months] / the defendant committed the same kind of crime in the case of this case while being tried for the same kind of crime even though he had been sentenced to a fine twice for the same crime.