Defendants are dissatisfied with the victim F, who is the director of the management office of the said apartment, newly appointed by E, the representative of the occupant of the said apartment in Busan Shipping Daegu D, and around May 18, 2015, at the entrance of the above apartment management office around 08:30 on May 18, 2015, the victim is not a party to correspondence.

No complaint shall be recognized as a complaint.

There is an existing complaint, and why is why there is this.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance, such as satisfying the victim's shoulder, and pushing the victim's shoulder.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the operation of the apartment management office of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty)

1. Sentence Defendants: Fines of 300,000 won;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (one hundred thousand won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the sentence shall be postponed by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendants did not want the punishment against the Defendants; (b) the extent of power exercised by the Defendants against the victims is relatively minor; (c) the Defendants did not have any history of criminal punishment exceeding the suspension of qualifications; and (d) the Defendants did not have any history of criminal punishment against the victims; and (b) the process of protesting