However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around the fourth floor of D amusement drinking places located in C at Silung-si on March 12, 2017; (b) from the border F for the victim of the E District belonging to the Silung-gu Police Station Ear-gu, Silung-si, who was reported to 112; and (c)

"The victim, who was asked, calculated to be designated as her head, this son, this son, and this son expressed the victim's head at once, and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) [decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the liability for the crime is not minor in light of the circumstances and methods of the crime in this case, and that there is no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine, etc., the sentence like the order shall be determined in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, and that there is no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine.