A. The pertinent Plaintiff, from Jun. 27, 198, worked as a certified judicial scrivener office and an attorney-at-law office located in Ulsan Do and Port Area from Jun. 27, 198. The Defendant, from Feb. 1999, operates a certified judicial scrivener office in Daegu and Ulsan Do area.

B. On September 2012, the Defendant, including the Defendant’s accusation against the Plaintiff, submitted or accused the Plaintiff, etc. to an investigative agency on the ground that the Plaintiff was performing the affairs of a certified judicial scrivener in the Ulledo area after receiving a license certificate from a certified judicial scrivener.

The contents and results of the dispositions shall be as follows:

on September 2012, 1200 of the date of the disposition of the name of the accused accused case as the date of accusation of No. 1 of the Table 1.

1. C

2. Non-existence of the second immediately preceding two days of the date on which he was suspected of having been suspected of having committed a violation of the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act by the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office 2012 Petition No. 148;

1. D;

2. Non-prosecutions of the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office in violation of the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act (No. 2013-type and No. 5383) on April 23, 2013;

1. E;

2. F;

3. Non-existence of the date of August 4, 2014, dismissal No. 2014-type No. 10873 of the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office, which violated the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act;

1. The plaintiff;

2. D;

3. The District Prosecutors' Office in Daegu District Prosecutors' Office that has violated the G Certified Judicial Scriveners Act, 2014-type and 10494; and

2. After dismissal, the Defendant filed an appeal on April 14, 2015, which was dismissed by the High Public Prosecutor’s Office of Daegu High Public Prosecutor’s Office (2014 High Public Prosecutor’s Office) and (1706), respectively, dismissed the reappeal by the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office (2015 High Public Prosecutor’s Office) and 459 on July 28, 2015. On November 5, 2014, the Plaintiff’s violation of the Subsidy Management Act, the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Daegu High Public Prosecutor’s Office in violation of the Resident Registration Act (Evidence of Evidence) was suspected (29 December 2015, 2015), and the Defendant, in addition to filing an accusation, submitted a written petition on the Plaintiff’s bulletin board or a certified judicial scrivener’s organization with respect to the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant charges, etc.”).

as follows: < by Presidential Decree No. 2069, Dec. 2, 200>

Terms and conditions of the date set forth in Table 2 shall be December 1, 2012.