도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 19, 2013, at around 18:25, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) driving a vehicle, the Defendant, without a vehicle driver’s license, driven the B rocketing passenger at approximately 5km away from the 5km section, to the northwest-dong, west-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, without a vehicle driver’s license, on the roads near the luminous market. In such a case, the Defendant was obliged to take a duty of care of operating the front road of the Daegu-gu Scattering-dong, Daegu-gu, 185-22, by driving the said rocketing car at the time and driving the front road along the fire-fighting road without a line in the direction of the Gu Gyeong-gu, while driving the front road at a speed of about 20 km in the direction of the Gu Gyeong-gu, and thus, in such a case, the vehicle driver was well aware of the front side and the left side and operation of the operation.
Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to stop immediately and failed to take necessary measures despite being parked on the right side of the victim C, which was parked on the right side of the road, due to the negligence of neglecting this, and the victim C's left-hand side of the car which was parked on the right side of the road.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) at around 19:15 on the same day after the occurrence of an accident described in paragraph (1) of the same Article, and was exposed to the police officer of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station E District District Police Station, which called upon receiving a report from the victim on the road in front of the Northwest-gu Scattering-dong located in the Daegu Seo-gu Scattering-dong, and thereafter, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking a large amount of alcohol in the Defendant’s entrance, and the molding distance, etc., and received a demand for a measurement of the volume of alcohol four times from the F slope of the traffic survey system belonging to the above police station
Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police with C 1.