2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the number of victims of the instant traffic accident caused by the instant traffic accident does not have a large number of victims; (b) the victims suffered injury requiring medical treatment for at least two weeks to eight weeks; (c) the Defendant’s negligence in violation of the signal also did not be less than that of the victims; and (d) other circumstances, such as the background, means and methods of the instant crime; (b) the circumstances after the instant crime was committed; and (c) the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (d) the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.