However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

On April 21, 2013, from around 08:05 to 11:10 on the same day, the Defendants came into the Doin apartment parking lot located in the Doin apartment of 359-10, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seogu, Daejeon, and discovered the chip low-scale car parked by the victim D, Defendant B reported the network by the victim, Defendant B made the cres without the victim open a vehicle’s key to his name and made the key to the vehicle, and Defendant A used the vehicle’s key to cut off the property of the victim by driving the above vehicle of 6.5 million won at the market price owned by the victim by using the key to the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning D and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1448, Apr. 2, 201)

1. On the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., grounds for sentencing under the following and conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act) of each Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14488, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14848, Apr. 2, 2009)).