except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the member of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Complex for the First Course, and D shall be the chairperson of the above senior citizen center.

On January 9, 2014, the Defendant filed a complaint with the public service center of the Seoul Dobong Police Station located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Dobong-gu, Seoul, with the aim of having D criminal punishment. “Around January 3, 2014, the Defendant filed a complaint with the purport that “D, the Defendant, who is the Defendant, submitted the complaint to the effect that “Around January 3, 2014, he was asked by the 1 Senior Citizens Association of Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul, to disclose the details of the use of the expenses from the complainants, leaving the complainants seated in the first Senior Citizens Association of Dobong-gu, Seoul, and caused an injury, such as confection, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, so that D, who is the Defendant’s complaint,

However, even though the audit was conducted on January 3, 2014 with respect to the helper subsidy received from Dobong-gu at the above senior citizen center, the defendant, who was seated by D, in another place, was living together with the defendant's shoulder, and the defendant was living together, and the defendant's appeal was filed against the operation of the above senior citizen center in Pyeongtaek-gu despite the fact that the defendant's escape or he did not go away from his will, despite the fact that he did not do so, he did not file a false complaint.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported false facts to the Seoul Dobong Police Station and rejected D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 156 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the person under suspended execution is against his/her will, that the person under suspended execution does not want the punishment against the defendant, and that he/she is an old person);