2. While the Defendant committed the instant crime against the victim, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in August 23, 2012 due to the Defendant’s intrusion upon the victim’s residence with dangerous things, and the Defendant committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, deadly weapon, etc.) on August 23, 2012 (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (abandoning and damaging Property) by causing bodily injury, etc., and the Defendant again committed the instant crime against the same victim during the suspended sentence of three months since it did not go beyond three months after the sentence was sentenced, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime against the same victim during the suspended sentence period due to the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, means, and consequence, and the circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., even if the sentence of the Defendant’s punishment becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, is not justified.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.