When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle as a gallon.

On October 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on October 29, 2014, and proceeded along two lanes from the surface of the right line at the Seopo City of Seopopopopopopo City to the surface of the right line at the right line at the right line at the right line at the right line of Seopo City of Seopopo City.

There is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing speed and checking well the front side of the road, and to prevent the accident by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to proceed in violation of the signal while the signal was changed to the stop signal of the vehicle, and the victim D(52 years old) driving from the right side of the proceeding to the left side of the normal signal to the intersection according to the normal signal, and the latter part of the EM5 vehicle volume left side of the vehicle driven by the victim D(52 years old) was collisioned with the front part of the vehicle.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim D, such as salt ties and tensions of the bones of necks requiring medical treatment for about 8 weeks, and cerebral dye in detail as having no open address in two parts, and suffered injury to the victim F (V, 47 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, due to approximately 2 weeks of cryp, tensions, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared by D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances:

e.beliable;