When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2012. 8. 16.경 서울 강남구 삼성동에 있는 골든타워빌딩 12층에서 피해자 주식회사 케이티캐피탈과 사이에 B 짚랭글러 자동차에 대하여 “취득원가 : 52,635,670원, 월 리스료 : 1,286,900원, 리스기간 : 36개월” 등으로 하는 자동차리스 계약을 체결하고 위 자동차를 인도받은 후 2013. 3. 16.경부터 리스료를 납부하지 아니하여 이에 피해자로부터 2013. 10. 7.경 위 리스 계약에 대한 해지 통지와 함께 위 자동차의 반환을 요구받았다.

Since the lease contract was terminated as above, the defendant refused to return the above vehicle to the victim, despite the existence of the obligation to return the vehicle, and borrowed KRW 10 million from C at the beginning of March 2014, and embezzled it by transferring the above vehicle to C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify automobile lease contracts, specifications of automobile lease contracts, estimates for operation lease, automobile registration certificates, and termination of overland lease contracts;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the confession of the defendant; the primary offender is favorable; the primary offender does not completely recover from damage even though the amount of damage is considerable; etc., the punishment is determined as ordered by considering the unfavorable circumstances.