When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From around 03:00 on April 12, 2016 to around 04:36 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the Gyeongnam-gu and the first floor reading room of the University of Technology University Library of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant: (b) stolen the Defendant’s total of 60,000 won of trade English-class 1, the total market value of the victim C, which was kept in custody in front of the entrance; (c) one of the ETS’s English-class English-level English-related English-related English-related English-related issues; and (d) 220,000 won of the market value of the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement law to C and D

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order committed the crime of this case in the period of probation although he had been sentenced three times as fines for the same kind of crime, the defendant's liability for the crime of this case during the period of probation is not minor. However, the defendant's punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the records of this case and the theory of changes, such as the following facts: the defendant's late reflects his own crime; the value of damaged goods is not large; the defendant's history of probation is not for the same crime; the defendant's mental disorder is not for the same kind of crime; the defendant's history of probation is not for the same crime; and the defendant's mental illness is likely to have an impact on some degree of