하자보수금보증금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 156,978,500 among the Plaintiff and KRW 101,000 among them, shall be KRW 55,978,500 from February 14, 2015, and KRW 55,978,500.
Basic Facts
A. The plaintiff is a party. 1) The plaintiff is a 350-dong 350 apartment complex in the ASEAN-ro 73 (Ariju-dong) Dong-ro.
(2) The defendant (the name of Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation was changed from July 1, 2015 to the name of Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation) is the council of occupants' representatives composed of occupants for the management of the apartment building in this case and the following.
The company is the company that entered into the warranty contract for the apartment of this case, such as the statement in the subsection.
B. 1) On December 14, 2005, the Defendant entered into a warranty insurance contract for defects in the first year, second year, second year, third year, five years (the evidence No. 3-1 of the instant apartment from December 15, 2005 to December 14, 2010) of the instant apartment on the condition that tin and guarantee creditor are the competent market (the Defendant entered into a warranty insurance contract for defects in the period of 148,718,250 won) and ten years (the evidence No. 3-2 of the A, guarantee period from December 15, 2005 to December 14, 2015).
)을 체결하고 보증보험증권을 발급하였다. ◇ 약관 제1조(용어의 정의) 이 약관에서 사용하는 용어의 정의는 다음과 같습니다. 4. ‘하자’라 함은 주택법 시행령 별표6 및 별표7의 ‘하자보수대상시설공사의 구분 및 하자의 범위와 하자보수책임기간’에 의한 하자를 말합니다. 5. ‘보증사고’라 함은 주택법 시행령 별표6 및 별표7의 하자보수대상시설공사에 발생한 하자로서 각 공종별 하자보수책임기간 내에 발생한 하자에 대하여 보증채권자의 하자보수청구에도 불구하고 주채무자가 정당한 사유 없이 하자보수를 이행하지 아니하는 경우를 말합니다. 제3조(보증채무의 내용 보증회사는 주택법 시행령 별표6 및 별표7에서 정한 하자보수대상시설공사에 발생한 하자로서...